TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS: EPA violation history, explained
TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS has at least one health-based violation EPA's ECHO database still lists as unaddressed - the required fix has not been reported complete. Population served: 4,781, over 1,387 connections.
TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS's record against the rest of the country
Out of 12,903 systems in this dataset, TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS ranks 905th by violation burden (93th percentile) - 25 violations total, 20 health-baseds.
Against the LA average
TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS's 20 health-based violations sit above the LA average of 12.6, across 347 systems statewide. The filter guide explains what a violation like this actually calls for.
Most recent violation on record
TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS's most recent violation on record is dated 2024-08-05, with the most recent health-based one dated 2023-01-04. Last reported to EPA: 06/23/2026.
The concern categories on record
TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Coliform (TCR); Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule; Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
- Synthetic organic chemicals / pesticides / VOCs - flagged from: CARBON, TOTAL
- Disinfection byproducts - flagged from: TTHM; Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS's record does not cover
This is what TOWN OF LUTCHER WATERWORKS reported to its state primacy agency and EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act - real regulatory record, not a lab test of your specific tap. Water quality can still change between the meter and the faucet - household plumbing sits outside what a record of 25 logged violations can see. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.