NEWCASTLE: EPA violation history, explained
NEWCASTLE has a health-based violation on record, but none in the last five years - an older issue, not necessarily a current one. Population served: 7,900, over 5,032 connections.
NEWCASTLE's record against the rest of the country
Out of 12,903 systems in this dataset, NEWCASTLE ranks 3,516th by violation burden (73th percentile) - 29 violations total, 5 health-baseds.
How NEWCASTLE compares within OK
NEWCASTLE's 5 health-based violations sit within the OK average of 39.5, across 240 systems statewide. The filter guide explains what a violation like this actually calls for.
Most recent violation on record
The last violation EPA has on record for NEWCASTLE is from 2025-01-10 (health-based: 2012-01-07). Last reported to EPA: 05/13/2026.
What kind of problem, specifically
NEWCASTLE's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Coliform (TCR)
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What this data is and is not
NEWCASTLE's numbers here come from its own required reporting to EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act, not from an independent test of your glass of water. Between the utility's meter and NEWCASTLE's customers' taps is household plumbing, invisible to a system-level record ranked 3,516th of 12,903 by violation count. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.