What's in MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2's water?
MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2 had a health-based violation within the last five years. The required corrective action was reported, but it happened recently enough to matter. 17,587 people get their water from it, across 7,146 connections.
How this compares nationally
MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2 has 64 violations on record in total, 56 of thems health-based - ranking it 224th of 12,903 systems by violation count, the 98th percentile nationally.
How MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2 compares within
Among the 244 systems in this dataset, the average is 11.2 health-based violations - MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2's 56 is above that. See the lead and copper guide for why lead counts differently.
Most recent violation on record
The last violation EPA has on record for MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2 is from 2025-01-10 (health-based: 2025-01-10). Last reported to EPA: 05/13/2026.
What kind of problem, specifically
MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Coliform (TCR); Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
- Synthetic organic chemicals / pesticides / VOCs - flagged from: CARBON, TOTAL
- Disinfection byproducts - flagged from: TTHM; Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What this data is and is not
Everything on this page is MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2's own reported record under the Safe Drinking Water Act - a regulatory filing, not a sample of your tap. This record - 56 health-based violations on file for MARSHALL COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT #2 - stops at the meter and cannot see household plumbing on the other side of it. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.