Is KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM's water safe to drink?
KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM has a health-based violation on record, but none in the last five years - an older issue, not necessarily a current one. It serves 2,715 people through 1,556 service connections.
How this compares nationally
Out of 12,903 systems in this dataset, KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM ranks 9,045th by violation burden (30th percentile) - 3 violations total, 1 health-based.
Against the SD average
Among the 74 SD systems in this dataset, the average is 3.0 health-based violations - KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM's 1 is at or below that. See the lead and copper guide for why lead counts differently.
Most recent violation on record
KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM's most recent violation on record is dated 2007-01-10, with the most recent health-based one dated 2007-01-10. Last reported to EPA: 06/17/2026.
The concern categories on record
KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Coliform (TCR)
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM's record does not cover
KINGBROOK II RURAL WATER SYSTEM's numbers here come from its own required reporting to EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act, not from an independent test of your glass of water. Water quality can still change between the meter and the faucet - household plumbing sits outside what a record of 3 logged violations can see. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.