Juncos - Ceiba Sur, PR Water Quality
What's in Juncos - Ceiba Sur's water?
Juncos - Ceiba Sur had a health-based violation within the last five years. The required corrective action was reported, but it happened recently enough to matter. It serves 36,835 people through 13,796 service connections.
Juncos - Ceiba Sur's record against the rest of the country
Out of 12,903 systems in this dataset, Juncos - Ceiba Sur ranks 6th by violation burden (100th percentile) - 688 violations total, 267 health-based.
How Juncos - Ceiba Sur compares within PR
PR's 120 covered systems average 48.9 health-based violations each; Juncos - Ceiba Sur carries 267, more than typical for the state. The filter guide explains what a violation like this actually calls for.
Most recent violation on record
The last violation EPA has on record for Juncos - Ceiba Sur is from 2024-01-05 (health-based: 2024-01-05). Last reported to EPA: 06/05/2026.
What kind of problem, specifically
Juncos - Ceiba Sur's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Coliform (TCR); Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule; Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule; Surface Water Treatment Rule
- Synthetic organic chemicals / pesticides / VOCs - flagged from: Carbon, Total
- Disinfection byproducts - flagged from: Tthm; Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What this data is and is not
This is what Juncos - Ceiba Sur reported to its state primacy agency and EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act - real regulatory record, not a lab test of your specific tap. Water quality can still change between the meter and the faucet - household plumbing sits outside what a record of 688 logged violations can see. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.