What's in JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT's water?
JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT has a health-based violation on record, but none in the last five years - an older issue, not necessarily a current one. 11,538 people get their water from it, across 5,187 connections.
How this compares nationally
Out of 12,903 systems in this dataset, JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT ranks 1,262th by violation burden (90th percentile) - 21 violations total, 15 health-baseds.
Against the AR average
AR's 243 covered systems average 7.1 health-based violations each; JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT carries 15, more than typical for the state. The clean-record guide covers what a comparison like this can hide.
Most recent violation on record
JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT's most recent violation on record is dated 2020-01-04, with the most recent health-based one dated 2020-01-04. Last reported to EPA: 05/12/2026.
The concern categories on record
JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Surface Water Treatment Rule
- Disinfection byproducts - flagged from: TTHM
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT's record does not cover
This is what JAMES FORK REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT reported to its state primacy agency and EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act - real regulatory record, not a lab test of your specific tap. Water quality can still change between the meter and the faucet - household plumbing sits outside what a record of 21 logged violations can see. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.