Is GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's water safe to drink?
GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT has a health-based violation on record, but none in the last five years - an older issue, not necessarily a current one. 5,280 people get their water from it, across 2,112 connections.
GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's record against the rest of the country
Out of 12,903 systems in this dataset, GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT ranks 7,019th by violation burden (46th percentile) - 3 violations total, 2 health-baseds.
Against the ND average
Among the 52 ND systems in this dataset, the average is 2.1 health-based violations - GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's 2 is at or below that. The clean-record guide covers what a comparison like this can hide.
Most recent violation on record
GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's most recent violation on record is dated 2001-01-11, with the most recent health-based one dated 2001-01-11. Last reported to EPA: 06/29/2026.
The concern categories on record
GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Lead & copper - flagged from: Lead and Copper Rule
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Coliform (TCR)
The most severe category on record is lead & copper, which points toward a lead-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's record does not cover
Everything on this page is GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT's own reported record under the Safe Drinking Water Act - a regulatory filing, not a sample of your tap. This record - 2 health-based violations on file for GREATER RAMSEY WATER DISTRICT - stops at the meter and cannot see household plumbing on the other side of it. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.