BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002): EPA violation history, explained
BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002) has a health-based violation on record, but none in the last five years - an older issue, not necessarily a current one. 6,814 people get their water from it, across 3,196 connections.
How this compares nationally
23 total violations and 6 health-based ones put BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002) at the 76th percentile nationally for violation burden, rank 3,078 of 12,903.
How BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002) compares within SC
BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002)'s 6 health-based violations sit above the SC average of 3.8, across 198 systems statewide. The clean-record guide covers what a comparison like this can hide.
Most recent violation on record
The last violation EPA has on record for BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002) is from 2025-01-10 (health-based: 2006-01-07). Last reported to EPA: 06/29/2026.
What kind of problem, specifically
BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002)'s flagged contaminants and rule violations, grouped by what they actually mean for a filter choice rather than left as EPA's raw code list:
- Microbial contamination / treatment technique - flagged from: Surface Water Treatment Rule
- Disinfection byproducts - flagged from: TTHM; Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
The most severe category on record is microbial contamination / treatment technique, which points toward a microbial-class filter if you want to address it directly.
What this data is and is not
BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002)'s numbers here come from its own required reporting to EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act, not from an independent test of your glass of water. Between the utility's meter and BATESBURG LEESVILLE DPW (SC3210002)'s customers' taps is household plumbing, invisible to a system-level record ranked 3,078th of 12,903 by violation count. The guide to what this data misses covers that gap.